3*
This YA version of a Victorian romance features a progressive young woman, Lucinda, who refuses to be constrained by society’s limitations on women (in both her work and personal life). She has to also fight against the classism that prevents her from being accepted by the aristocracy because her parents were lowborn, even if her father did rise from street sweeper to wealthy financier. David, the son of her father’s business partner, took his father’s place after his death. As he and Lucinda become reacquainted after she leaves finishing school, their mutual respect and affection grow, and he gives her the opportunity to be part of the company without her father’s knowledge (since he holds traditional views of young women). The strengths and weaknesses in this book balance each other out, leaving us with a just so-so read. Given the interests of today’s teens, I think this would struggle to find an audience.
Pros: feminism; Lucinda’s friendship with the American Persephone Merritt; the equal partnership (both personal and professional) with David; Lucinda’s refusal to be metaphorically caged by society and the literal burns inflicted on her by the crinoline case, a fashion she later discards in favor of bloomers. “You think I should wear bloomers?” “I thought you no longer wished to be caged.” “I don’t.” “Then stop caring what other people think. That’s the greatest cage of all,” Persephone said.”
Cons: surface treatment of classism that seems almost disingenuous; Persephone’s ignorance of the peerage (which would have been drilled into her before arriving in London); comment about David regretting risking his life to rescue the papers from the fire when it was that action that saved Lucinda and her father (“he felt bitter regret that he had nearly risked his life for a few signatures that had not even been at his countinghouse to begin with”); repetitive mention of Mrs. Patton’s narcolepsy; misuse of me, myself, and I at least twice (may be corrected in final publication); historical inaccuracy about a dinner party (there is a strict order of entry based on rank and choosing your dinner companion wasn’t done).
I received a complimentary ARC of this book from Swoon Reads through NetGalley in exchange for an honest review. Opinions expressed are completely my own.
Pros: feminism; Lucinda’s friendship with the American Persephone Merritt; the equal partnership (both personal and professional) with David; Lucinda’s refusal to be metaphorically caged by society and the literal burns inflicted on her by the crinoline case, a fashion she later discards in favor of bloomers. “You think I should wear bloomers?” “I thought you no longer wished to be caged.” “I don’t.” “Then stop caring what other people think. That’s the greatest cage of all,” Persephone said.”
Cons: surface treatment of classism that seems almost disingenuous; Persephone’s ignorance of the peerage (which would have been drilled into her before arriving in London); comment about David regretting risking his life to rescue the papers from the fire when it was that action that saved Lucinda and her father (“he felt bitter regret that he had nearly risked his life for a few signatures that had not even been at his countinghouse to begin with”); repetitive mention of Mrs. Patton’s narcolepsy; misuse of me, myself, and I at least twice (may be corrected in final publication); historical inaccuracy about a dinner party (there is a strict order of entry based on rank and choosing your dinner companion wasn’t done).
I received a complimentary ARC of this book from Swoon Reads through NetGalley in exchange for an honest review. Opinions expressed are completely my own.
No comments:
Post a Comment